Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 17:35:21
ID: 51873
In response to a confession. Sorry, I meant “saying here”.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(0) hug(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 17:32:44
ID: 51872
In response to a confession. I agree, but I suppose their point about the white guys being dead is that there is no way for them to be treated now. They didn’t say anything about what is deserved in terms of treatment of different races. I’m not saying they weren’t being rude or hostile. I’m not saying this person isn’t racist, but what they’re here saying isn’t. There was a derogatory tone in “libs”, but no real insults were thrown out. My qualm was that no one had any good replies. It was all Cheeto dust and “typical [deleted] repub response” all while trying to poke fun at this poster for having nothing to say. My point is that this person actually said something. It may’ve sounded rude, but it was something other than “lib-tard” or “Cheeto head”. That was the reason I jumped in, to point that out. I’m just here for entertainment.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(0) hug(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 16:42:53
ID: 51871
In response to a confession. Kellyanne? Oh no! There goes my anonymity. I’m defending something blatantly racist? What exactly? What did this person say or even imply that was negative or disdainful about another race? Not playing into the idea that white men are all monsters (“Just another white male committing a mass shooting” and how we’d all lose our minds if he were Muslim, trying to start shit and succeeding) is not the same. Calling out someone out for their BS (what this person did) is not racist. If they’d said anything derogatory about another race, I wouldn’t defend that. I understand that their wording wasn’t friendly and I see where some might feel it garners a hostile reply, but they never actually said anything to the effect of what is deserved based on race, just that the white men are dead. TBH, I didn’t really get the point of that part other than nothing can be done about them now.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(0) hug(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 06:29:57
ID: 51825
I'm still confused. Is someone angry because white criminals are being discussed, as opposed to African American and/or Islamic criminals?
metoo(3) omg(0) fave(0) hug(0) comments(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 06:28:39
ID: 51851
In response to a confession. There's a right way and a wrong way to talk about how different races are treated, even if you're citing actual facts. I'm just going to assume you don't understand how racist the other person was being.
metoo(2) omg(0) fave(1) hug(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 06:27:50
ID: 51850
In response to a confession. Whatever facts the other poster stated were negated by the racist verbiage and name calling. If you can't figure that out and want to keep being an apologist for them, go ahead. You have every right to do that. But don't rant and rave when you get lumped into the Trump-loving, racist category. Honestly, I wouldn't have even known that you and the racist are two different people, because you tend to say the same crazy things. Like when someone posts something blatantly racist and you say "their use of harsh words doesn't make them inaccurate." LOL. Okay, Kellyanne.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(3) hug(0) comments(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-19 02:33:04
ID: 51860
In response to a confession. Please show me one racist quote or phrase from this poster. Saying that someone else hates white men isn't racist. You might get the impression this person is racist, but they never said anything racist. Pointing out that no one was talking about non-white shooters either isn't racist. Telling people to fuck off for trying to convince white people they should be angry at themselves simply for being white isn't racist. Forgive me for not slitting my wrists.
metoo(0) omg(3) fave(1) hug(2)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-18 23:05:42
ID: 51848
In response to a confession. I thought that post was aimed at me and the poster who uses the term “libs” because I’m looking past the term “libs” and defending the fact that this poster has actually made some good points, at least in terms of what goes on here. Someone else started this with their rant about “If the shooter were Muslim.....” No one was talking about ANY of the shooters in particular. A lot of people would say I’m part of “the problem” because I didn’t vote......AT ALL this past election. I’ve only voted twice in my entire life and that was for......GASP!...Obama! Somehow I’m lumped in as a Trump loving racist because I don’t instantly dismiss what someone says because I’m too bent out of shape over “divisive language”. I may not see eye to eye with they other poster, but they were right in calling out that inflammatory, BS post. They stated things that were actual facts, whereas no one else did or had any counter argument. Their use of harsh words doesn’t make them inaccurate.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(1) hug(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-18 22:18:52
ID: 51837
We've had rational discussions on here before about how it's bullshit that white shooters have mental illness, while a person of color is labeled a terrorist or thug. That doesn't seem to be what's happening here, though. If you're upset because people are talking about white shooters, and your only counterpoint is, "But the black guy did it, too!" I'm going to tune you out.
metoo(4) omg(0) fave(3) hug(0) comments(0)
Posted by: anonymous
2017-11-18 21:25:36
ID: 51811
I've voted Republican my entire adult life, except for 2016. All this nonsense of calling people names, like Lib, when they disagree with you is ridiculous. I can't disagree with anyone in my family, online, or elsewhere without being called a name. I've always considered myself conservative, but apparently, I'm a libtard because I'm not OK with racism and misogyny. It just shows how immature these people are. I would suggest not engaging with them. Especially when their only argument is to deflect. "But what about the black shooters? Killary? Obama?!! Uranium??!!" Count me in as the newest member of the shrieking dolphins club, I guess.
metoo(2) omg(0) fave(4) hug(0) comments(0)