Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-04 00:22:50
ID: 29721
So you pick on something else about it to avoid the point. Got it...
metoo(1) omg(3) fave(1) hug(1)
 
Posted by: Stormyweather
2015-09-03 21:05:20
ID: 29711
Ha ha!!!that fundie idiot hypocrite Kim Davis is in jail. So much for her "personally held beliefs, she's trying to stop other Eros from issuing licences too!!
metoo(4) omg(1) fave(13) hug(0) comments(0)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 18:07:41
ID: 29705
China is colonizing Africa and providing infrastructure. They import their own labor much of the time. They want Africa's resources. They also want to remove a large part of their population to another continent so as not to have to feed them. China is grabbing offshore Pacific islands to use as bases. When China consolidates all these moves, China will have 2 continents. China will never be a democracy. I guess we should all learn Chinese and look forward to the day when we are all equal under Marxism, i.e., no one has much.
metoo(0) omg(1) fave(1) hug(2) comments(2)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 17:23:50
ID: 29698
to Elizabeth Hesselback: Ann Coulter and Donald Trump should also be called Hate Groups.
metoo(5) omg(1) fave(1) hug(0) comments(0)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 16:55:38
ID: 29693
Third World refers to countries that weren't considered a part of the communist bloc or the capitalist bloc. It has nothing to do with wealth or income. It's become shorthand for developing nations, but that's really incorrect since places like the DRC and Vietnam don't count as third world nations, though they do in the popular imagination. "Third World" isn't derogatory, but it's inaccurate in the way it's used most of the time. If you want a more accurate, more polite term that doesn't sound pretentious you could say "the developing world."
metoo(2) omg(0) fave(3) hug(0) comments(1)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 15:49:00
ID: 29688
Better tell wiki that.
metoo(0) omg(0) fave(0) hug(0)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 14:53:05
ID: 29682
Dude, Third world was considered offensive nearly two decades ago when I was in high school. Where've you been? If you must refer to other nations as being worse off than ours, and it's best to not use "blanket" statements, then developing nation, LIC or or "Global South" is better. None of those terms is perfect however, and given that most of the reason many of these countries are in a shitty state is because we colonised them and are still basically enslaving people to mine our diamonds and grow our coffee and bananas and chocolate, you could just avoid referring to such countries in such a derisive and dismissive manner at all. Especially when many actually are having such a boom that they are likely to be more wealthy than us in the future.
metoo(0) omg(7) fave(0) hug(0)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 14:43:21
ID: 29679
Re: third world; I didn't know there was another term? What is it?
metoo(4) omg(0) fave(1) hug(0) comments(1)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 14:28:16
ID: 29675
"Third world"? Are people actually still saying that?
metoo(0) omg(3) fave(1) hug(1)
 
Posted by: anonymous
2015-09-03 14:22:33
ID: 29674
I don't think that word means what you think it means, judging by your insane ranting response which has absolutely nothing to do with a privileged attitude.
metoo(0) omg(1) fave(0) hug(0)